it is better to have more than it gives than less than it does.
The idea is that some of our desires and needs go beyond what is given, and that we have a tendency to ignore them. By the ceteris paribus assumption, that means we should be able to have more than we need, especially when we have a lot of things we really like. It’s often assumed that people need more things just because they like them, and that the only way to make things less than they are is to give them less.
This is a fallacy. The idea of “more than it gives” isn’t meant to be an excuse for not giving. The idea is that when we think we have more than enough, we can’t really afford to take care of ourselves, so we tend to neglect the things that are really important to us. The ceteris paribus assumption is just an assumption that’s easy to make and hard to un-learn.
The problem with the assumption is that your expectation of more is not what you actually believe. It is the expectation that your expectations of the things you really believe will be in the future, not the past. This is why I believe the ceteris paribus assumption is a better way to motivate people. You can get more than that by accepting the expectations that people have, rather than giving them more than they actually are.
I believe the assumption is a good way of motivating people to do more things, rather than using a fixed amount that you have to pay people to do more things. Instead, we should be giving them more than they are actually worth.
It’s really hard to see a demand curve for a specific set of things. Sure, you have a hard number that you hope people will take, but the demand curve may be much more complicated and difficult to see. What we can do is look at a number and ask, “what will it be for this next period?” I’ve done this with our yearly sales cycle and the demand curve is very similar to the first half of the year.
If we take the demand curve for the entire year and see that it is similar to the first half, then we might think that demand for any given thing is pretty much the same. So, we might assume that demand for a particular product or service is the same as the demand for its next period, and the demand curve for the year is quite similar to the first half of the year.
This is correct for most products and services. If we take the demand curve for all items in the product category and see that all products are selling at roughly the same price, then the demand curve for the entire product category is the same. This is correct for most of them as well.
It’s not correct for products that are more in demand, or for which the demand curve is faster than the supply curve. For example, if a company has a demand curve that goes up as more consumers buy its products, then it will have difficulty meeting its own sales.
A person who is actually using the ‘demand curve’ as a way to keep up with demand can be the most important person in the game. This person has the most to lose. This person will do better if he or she gets a better rate of sales. That said, its not easy to get the price of a product when you can get the most from a product.